Page 56 - FoodFocusThailand No.246 October 2026
P. 56

SOURCE OF ENGINEER


                A study by Jiang et al. (2025) comparing BO with   become more reliable. This is particularly important when the
             RSM for high-moisture extrusion of plant-based proteins   reference model is no longer representative of the current product.
             for meat analogue production reported that BO achieved   The study by Pei et al. (2025), which developed a ginger-
             better predictive performance with fewer experiments. The   drying system combining far-infrared radiation with hot air and
             study also found that tensile-strength data could further   incorporated data from multiple sensors, including imaging and
             improve model performance. However, these findings   odor-related signals, demonstrates an interesting direction for
             represent evidence from the specific system investigated   using quality-related data to support decisions. Nevertheless,
             and should not be interpreted as evidence that BO is   soft sensors should be regarded as decision-support tools
             superior to RSM for all processes.               rather than replacements for verification testing, particularly for
                A practical approach is to combine shop-floor   moisture, which is not equivalent to verifying water activity or
             knowledge and DOE to identify variables and ranges, then   microbiological safety.
             apply BO within defined safety and machine constraints
             in advance.                                      From Digital Twin to Predictive Control
                                                              A valuable digital twin is not just a 3D simulation or dashboard,
             Hybrid Modeling: Integrating Physics             but a model linked to equipment and continuously updated with
             and Machine Learning for Practical,              real-time data. Investors must assess actual functionality, from
             Real-World Models                                status monitoring and prediction to sending commands back to
             Food raw materials vary by variety, season, moisture, and   control the process, as well as the level at which each capability
             ripeness. Data-only models may perform well initially but   has been tested and validated (Abdurrahman & Ferrari, 2025).
             degrade under new conditions. Physics-based models   With a reliable dynamic model, Model Predictive Control (MPC)
             may be too computationally heavy for real-time use.  forecasts process behavior, determines adjustments, implements
                Hybrid Models offer an interesting approach by   actions, and recalculates strategies as new data arrive. For
             combining physics knowledge with machine learning, for   example, MPC can be used to adjust temperature or conveyor
             example, using mass and energy balances as structure,   speed toward a target quality outcome while remaining within
             while machine learning learns variable parameters that   constraints such as equipment capacity and allowable process-
             vary with conditions or residual errors that the model   change rates. Though MPC has existed for decades, model and
             cannot explain. Starting with understandable, validated   data quality continue to evolve (Vassiliadis et al., 2020).
             models is often more practical than starting with complex   For existing plants, starting in Advisory Mode may be more
             ones.                                            appropriate: the system provides recommended settings to the
                Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) embed   machine operator and records the result before moving toward fully
             physical equations and boundary conditions into training,   automated control. The system should return to a validated recipe
             reducing predictions that contradict known behavior.   when sensors fail, data are missing, or the model encounters
             However, equations alone do not guarantee compliance   conditions outside its validated operating range. Meanwhile, safety
             with physical laws; therefore, deviations arising from both   systems and interlocks must remain independent of AI.
             the equations and the data still need to be evaluated
             separately (Karniadakis et al., 2021).           Optimizing Robustness,
                Wijerathne et al. (2025) reviewed PINNs in food drying,   Not Just Laboratory-Optimal Conditions
             highlighting their potential to connect data with multiscale   Operating conditions based on average raw material properties
             changes from cellular to product level. Limitations remain   may lie too close to specification limits, making consistent
             in data availability and model complexity, so PINNs are   production performance difficult. When raw materials vary or the
             an emerging technology rather than a ready-to-deploy   model contains prediction errors, the product may fall outside the
             system.                                          required specifications.
                                                                 Robust Optimization accounts for raw material variability
             Soft Sensor: Turning Process Data into           and  model  uncertainty.  Meanwhile,  Stochastic  Optimization
             Real-Time Quality Assessment                     incorporates probability distributions when sufficient data are
             A challenge in food plants is timely quality measurement.   available. The key idea is to shift the question from “What is
             Temperature and process conditions are monitored   the best value?” to “How should the conditions be selected to
             continuously, but moisture, texture, or compounds may   achieve good outcomes under realistic variability?” (Vassiliadis
             only be known after production and lab analysis.  et al., 2020).
                Soft Sensors help bridge this gap by integrating data   Advanced Process Optimization should begin with problems
             from measurement instruments with models to estimate   whose value can be measured in practical terms, with production
             quality attributes that cannot be measured directly or   data correctly connected and models evaluated using data that
             are difficult to measure during processing. For example,   were not used during training. This helps ensure that the results
             spectral data, images, weight, and environmental   reflect real-world operating conditions. Ultimately, the value of
             conditions can be combined to estimate moisture content.  Process Optimization does not lie in having the most sophisticated
                Ashtiani and Martynenko (2025) analyzed the   AI, but in making better and auditable decisions by combining the
             use of soft sensors in food drying and highlighted   capabilities of AI with the constraints and practical experience of
             key challenges, including calibration and maintaining   plant personnel, thereby improving outcomes across the entire
             prediction accuracy when the product or environmental   system.
             conditions change. Therefore, having more frequent
             data does not automatically mean that the estimates will


            56   FOOD FOCUS THAILAND  OCT  2026                         More Information        Service Info C008


                                                                                                                     22/9/2569 BE   19:16
         52-56_Source of Engineer_Ravis.indd   56
         52-56_Source of Engineer_Ravis.indd   56                                                                    22/9/2569 BE   19:16
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61