Page 48 - FoodFocusThailand No.240 April 2026
P. 48

STRONG QC & QA


             ตารางที่่� 1 แสดงปริิมาณสูงสุดของ PAs ในผลิิตภััณฑ์์อาหาริตามเกณฑ์์ของ EU legislation (Reg. EC No. 2023/915)
             Table 1   Shows the maximum levels of PAs in food products according to EU legislation (Reg. EC No. 2023/915).
                                             Food products                                   Maximum levels (μg/kg)

              Herbal Infusions (dried product) of rooibos, anise, lemon balm, chamomile, thyme, peppermint, lemon   400
              verbena and mixtures exclusively composed of dried herbs
              Other herbal infusions (dried product) excluding those mentioned above                 200
              Tea (Camellia sinensis) and flavoured tea (Camellia sinensis) (dried product)          150
              Tea (Camellia sinensis) and flavoured tea (Camellia sinensis) and herbal infusions for infants and young   75
              children (dried product)
              Tea (Camellia sinensis) and flavoured tea (Camellia sinensis) and herbal infusions for infants and young   1.0
              children (liquid)
              Food supplements containing herbal ingredients including extracts with the exception of the pollen-based
              food supplements, pollend and pollen products/Food supplements containing herbal ingredients including   400
              extracts with the exception of the pollen-based food supplements, pollend and pollen products
              Pollen based food supplements. Pollen and pollen products                              500
              Borage, lovage, marjoram and oregano (dried) and mixtures exclusively composed of these dried herbs  1,000
              Dried herbs except those mentioned above                                               400
              Source: Modified from Tábuas et al. (2024)



             Risk Assessment and Regulatory Framework             including sample preparation methods, solvent types,
             of PAs                                               separation techniques, and the analytical instruments used. In
             Concerns  about  the  toxicity  of  PAs  have  been  raised   the sample preparation stage, solid-phase extraction (SPE)
             internationally since 1988, when the World Health Organization   is commonly used. This involves using strong cation exchange
             (WHO) issued recommendations  to  reduce  exposure to   (SCX), polymeric cation exchange (PCX), or mixed-mode
             these toxins in food and herbal products. Subsequently, risk   cation exchange (MCX) sorbents packed into SPE cartridges
             assessment agencies in many countries have continued to   to isolate target compounds from interfering substances in
             develop guidelines and acceptable intake levels for PAs. In   the sample. Additionally, techniques such as QuEChERS
             2011, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) conducted   and salt-assisted liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) are
             a risk assessment of PAs in food and feed. Since many PAs   also employed.
             exhibit genotoxic and potentially carcinogenic properties,   The purpose of extraction is to separate PAs and PANOs
             the CONTAM Panel under EFSA established a reference   from other components in the food sample matrix. Generally,
             point of 237 µg/kg body weight per day for use in cancer risk   polar solvents such as methanol or acetonitrile are used,
             assessment. EFSA also indicated that exposure to PAs may   including aqueous solutions acidified with appropriate acids.
             pose health concerns, particularly for individuals who regularly   For the analytical determination step, liquid chromatography
             consume tea and herbal infusions.                    (LC) combined with mass spectrometry (MS) is widely
               According  to  the  European  Union  (EU)  regulations,   used, particularly LC–MS/MS, which enables the efficient
             maximum levels of PAs in food are established under   simultaneous  analysis  of  multiple  PAs. Typically,  a  C18
             Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915, which sets maximum   reversed-phase column is employed, along with a mobile
             concentration limits for various food categories, including   phase consisting of acidified water combined with organic
             tea, herbal infusions, herbal dietary supplements, and other   solvents such as methanol or acetonitrile. In addition, ultra-
             products. Products intended for infants and young children are   high-performance  liquid  chromatography  (UHPLC)  is
             subject to particularly strict limits. In Thailand, there are currently   another technique used for analysis, owing to its advantages in
             no specific regulatory limits established for PA levels in food.   resolution and sensitivity, arising from the use of columns with
             However, food safety and herbal product regulations are still   smaller particle sizes. Detection is commonly performed using
             enforced through the safety assessment of plant-based raw   electrospray ionization (ESI) coupled with a triple quadrupole
             materials and continuous monitoring of contaminants.  (QqQ) mass analyzer in an LC–MS/MS system. Measurements
                                                                  are conducted in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode,
             Laboratory Analysis of PAs                           which enhances both sensitivity and selectivity for detecting
             Since PAs are naturally occurring toxins that can adversely   PAs in complex food matrices.
             affect human health, the development of reliable analytical   PAs are naturally occurring toxins of significant concern
             methods is essential. However, the structural diversity of   in food safety, as they can enter the food chain and cause
             PAs, together with their presence at low concentration levels   both acute and chronic health effects. Therefore, systematic
             in complex food matrices, remains a significant challenge for   monitoring, risk assessment, and analytical determination are
             their analysis.                                      essential components for protecting consumers and supporting
               Analytical methods must provide high  sensitivity,   effective food safety management.
             selectivity, accuracy,  and precision. They  must  also
             undergo proper method validation and be cost-effective. The
             performance of the analysis depends on several factors,       More Information        Service Info C006

            48   FOOD FOCUS THAILAND  APR  2026


                                                                                                                     25/3/2569 BE   19:32
         44-48_Strong QC&QA_�����.indd   48                                                                          25/3/2569 BE   19:32
         44-48_Strong QC&QA_�����.indd   48
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53